Self-service
Artist↓Self-service platform↓DSP
- Built for very large numbers of users
- Standardized service
- Low-touch catalog management
- Limited relationship-based infrastructure
Professional music distribution
Make the same streams worth more.
Professional music distribution for creators who already have an audience.
Same music. Same listeners. Same promotion. Better monetization.
01 / The premise
You shouldn't have to get more streams to make more money.
Creators spend years building audiences. If you already generate meaningful streaming volume, changing how those streams are monetized can be more valuable than chasing another marginal increase in streams. LEVR focuses on the distribution layer.
Your catalog+Your existing streams+Better infrastructure=Better monetization
02 / The mechanism
Distribution isn't all the same.
The market has different tiers. Professional infrastructure brings operational history, catalog controls, rights systems, delivery and reporting that self-service platforms are not designed to provide in the same way.
Professional infrastructure
Artist↓LEVR↓Professional distribution↓DSP
- Established industry relationships
- Catalog and compliance oversight
- Professional delivery and reporting
- Higher-touch operational support
This does not mean every professional distributor pays more in every case. Outcomes vary with DSP, territory, subscription mix, catalog, commercial terms and reporting period.
03 / The offer
Give us one quarter to prove it.
Before
Measure your current effective revenue per stream.
Migrate
LEVR handles catalog migration and metadata continuity.
Run
Operate through LEVR for approximately one quarter.
Compare
Compare actual revenue per stream against your baseline.
Decide
Continue, or leave. If the result is worse, we move you back.
No long-term decision is required before seeing the data.
04 / The work
You keep making music. We handle the rest.
You
- Release music
- Make videos
- Promote normally
- Run your career
LEVR
- Catalog migration
- Distribution
- Metadata
- Delivery
- Reporting
- Support
- Onboarding
- Offboarding
The experiment changes the distribution layer — not the way you create.
05 / The timeframe
Why a quarter?
Streaming revenue arrives with reporting delays and month-to-month noise. A useful comparison needs enough data to reduce distortion from release timing, geography, DSP mix, listener variation and paid versus ad-supported streams.
Three months isn't designed to lock you in. It's designed to make the comparison useful.06 / The larger thesis
Distribution is the first layer.
Once the core distribution model is proven, bringing creator catalogs into one ecosystem creates opportunities beyond distribution.
Distribution↓
Publishing↓
Rights↓
Sync↓
Licensing↓
Brand / catalog opportunities
But the vision earns the right to exist only if the first promise works: make creators more money.
07 / The founder
Built from the creator side.
Slurpy @theslurpy
I'm a creator who releases music too. I went deep into distribution because I wanted to understand why the same streams can produce different economics.
The point isn't to sound like a visionary founder. It's to understand the infrastructure well enough to test whether it improves the numbers for creators like us.
08 / The questions
What creators usually ask.
The next step
Don't trust the pitch. Trust the comparison.
Show us the numbers you have now. We’ll tell you whether a pilot is worth discussing.
Book a call